Acer Aspire X3950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3950 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire X3950
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100505
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 155 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 203 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8520) CLim: 1533 MHz, MLim: 1810 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.24 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 37 32% 40 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,924 Write 31 Mixed 61.2 209% 1,006 MB/s	4K Read 387 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4.4 594% 131 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 251GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,667 Write 18.5 Mixed 54.2 654% 913 MB/s	4K Read 421 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 17,629% 141 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 54GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 7.8 7.7 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 18.3 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 10.2 23% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.7 180% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 39%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 344GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 18 Mixed 19 SusWrite 20.8 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 None CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.1% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3950 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3950

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	59x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	30x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	24x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	46x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	18x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	17x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnifosaBench 35%, 775 samples	9x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	7x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBToshibaBench 29%, 236 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16