Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 16:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 631
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 84.1
80% 90.5 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 76.6
72% 90 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,245
Write 1,455
Mixed 1,040
348% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 80.9
290% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 926
694% 926 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 296 293 297 296 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 487
Mixed 431
SusWrite 311
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.8
230% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
656GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 126 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD254GJ 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 35 41 41 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 16.2
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 37.5
18% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 28.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback