Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 10:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 123
51% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 281
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 849 MHz, MLim: 302 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 3.62
4% 4.66 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 334 335 352 343 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 406
Write 352
Mixed 287
SusWrite 337
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 28.3
98% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 133
99% 130 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73%
Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
153GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45% Average
Read 84.8
Write 82.3
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 71.6
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45%
Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
139GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 63 81 99 99 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 78.8
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 85.6
97% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 44%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
91GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.8 13 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 90.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 14.1
79% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback