HP Laptop 14-cm1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85B1
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 35.3
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 157
44% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 251
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 85B1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.08.04
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 7.88
5% 9.33 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 14.5
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 867
Write 883
Mixed 835
193% 861 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 47.2
178% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 550
420% 572 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8ET Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm1xxx Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback