Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 07:07
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 90.7
52% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 95.3
8-Core 118
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Lighting 9.73
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 11.3
8% 10 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 12.7
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.5 1.6 2 2.3 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 1.9
4% 4.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.7
439% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.1 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 10
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 4.2
6% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.7
456% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 40%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
339GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.2 4 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Read 7
Write 10
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.2
5% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C6NG9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback