Illegear RAVEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIllegear RAVEN  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 05:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 46.3
26% 39 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 128
13% 107 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 5.5
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 42.4
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 985
Write 1,389
Mixed 1,002
253% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 49
152% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 474
355% 474 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
ILG120M2SSDA 120GB
32GB free
Firmware: V2206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 55 82 82 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 386
Write 333
Mixed 281
SusWrite 93.5
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 13.2
74% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 138
125% 187 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5624-007.A00G 8G2666CL19 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 20.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAVEN Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Illegear RAVEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback