Gigabyte GA-G1.Assassin

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Assassin (all builds)
Memory	18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110429
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '17 at 16:30
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 96.2 1-Core 81 2-Core 162 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 508 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 632 39% 632 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Lighting 70.3 Reflection 63 Parallax 88.5 57% 73.9 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 80.3 56% 66.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 520ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5109903 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 -31009663865310 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2624 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1350 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 3808 (BD) vendor-specific 24 45 60132491288 (C2) HDA temperature 24 45 60132491288 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5109903 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5109903 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5109903 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18852 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16071 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16071 (F2) Unknown 0 0 32918	39.6% Below average	Read 299 Write 180 Mixed 188 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 11.8 52% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 11.7 12% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 65%
Volume_0000 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 802GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 74 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34387263908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4306 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15541 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3156 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5047 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5052 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 201864445974 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9602	60.9% Good	Read 117 Write 94.9 Mixed 112 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.2 101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34387132833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3388 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2507 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4539 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4539 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 193274511383 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	75.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 132 Mixed 60.8 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 802GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 780GB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 131 131 34388312500 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3435 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12369 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2551 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5147 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5147 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 197569478680 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7	74.3% Very good	Read 148 Write 110 Mixed 98.2 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.21 97% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 23.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 53.3 75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G1.Assassin Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Assassin

CPU
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	33x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	12x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBCrucial $40Bench 171%, 6,626 samples	4x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	23x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $727

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16