Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,163
103% 874 Pts
64-Core 2,903
180% 2,903 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 176
Parallax 185
152% 183 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 159
Splatting 110
123% 156 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1212 406 406 409 410 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,606
Write 2,270
Mixed 1,615
SusWrite 542
392% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 93.9
319% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 67
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 91.2
77% 109 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 242%
Great: 302%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 436 436 436 436 437 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 434
Mixed 410
SusWrite 436
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 50
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 50.7
66% 115 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 439 437 437 437 436 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 434
Mixed 420
SusWrite 437
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 49.8
165% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 40.2
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 50.1
42% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 26.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback