Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-GS4 FX (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '20 at 13:07
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 59.8 2-Core 126 56% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 192 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04A8) CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 52.1 Parallax 62.5 42% 55.6 fps	MRender 54.9 Gravity 51.6 Splatting 45.7 41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q072 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 117 54 67 62 65 MB/s Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.1% Above average	Read 229 Write 231 Mixed 221 SusWrite 88.5 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 39.8 131% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 52.4 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 63.6 52% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 91%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 116GB free Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	50% Average	Read 91.5 Write 87.2 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 82.4 58% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 118GB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 71 70 70 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 75.9 Write 75.3 Mixed 33 SusWrite 69.9 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 1x2GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	38x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	26x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16