Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 71 2-Core 132 56% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 210 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% PNY(196E 0789) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Lighting 5.97 Reflection 6.19 Parallax 2.53 5% 4.9 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 3.65 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 446GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 109 70 55 155 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 405 Write 346 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 102 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 4.5 28% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 16.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	6x
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 310 samples	4x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Transcend JM1333KLU-2G Transcend JM1333KLU-2G 8GBAdataBench 35%, 5 samples	4x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $192

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16