Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP900X3C-A03RU
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150715
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '20 at 09:57
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	50%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 85 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 112 58% 90 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 192 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.88 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.04 4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB 4,013 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: VZJ4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 330 370 361 328 320 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 453 Write 374 Mixed 292 SusWrite 348 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 16.8 64% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 125 103% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 88%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 33 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 33 43% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB 5,316 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	42x
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	35x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	132x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	26x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	25x
MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 987 samples	19x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BFU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 27%, 317 samples	40x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	29x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16