Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.72% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3420-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 29.9
49% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 158
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.47
3% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S3 60GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 33 34 60 67 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Read 65.3
Write 29
Mixed 90
SusWrite 40.8
13% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
6% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-123.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S1 Builds (Compare 1,782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback