HP 700-292d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 700-292d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory12.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 187
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 545
52% 431 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 29.8
19% 26.1 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 23.1
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
71GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 401 396 398 410 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 458
Mixed 354
SusWrite 388
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 45.3
155% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 148
168% 286 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 383 373 379 385 395 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 473
Write 434
Mixed 334
SusWrite 380
300% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 40.9
7,250% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 289
2,844% 333 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
622GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 138 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 153
Write 142
Mixed 108
SusWrite 139
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84%
Great: 108%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 127 128 130 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 127
Write 111
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 128
152% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
389GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 0 14 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 14.7
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-292d Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: HP 700-292d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback