HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 104
2-Core 182
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 388
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.4
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 36.4
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 454
Mixed 363
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28.1
96% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 176
145% 206 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 92%
JMicron Generic DISK00 750GB
76GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 94 44 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 77.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 33.4
74% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 42%
JMicron Generic DISK03 500GB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0.6 0.2 0 0 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 46.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 2
42% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK01 500GB
111GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 95 103 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 72
SusWrite 97.4
128% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 50%
JMicron Generic DISK04 2TB
476GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 0.3 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 209
Write 153
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 0.9
131% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 38%
JMicron Generic DISK02 500GB
267GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 2 59 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 79.6
Write 75.3
Mixed 57
SusWrite 66
93% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1867, 1333, 1867 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback