Asus Z87-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 13:07
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 424
54% 407 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3532) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.4
14% 17.6 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 20.1
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST3750525AS 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 384 376 374 376 376 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 424
Write 353
Mixed 260
SusWrite 380
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 17.4
116% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 118
122% 194 MB/s
Kingston SUV400S37120G 750GB
41GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 85.8
Write 88
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 78.8
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-050.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PLUS - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback