HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130327
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 126
55% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 579
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 31.7
21% 27.3 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 21.1
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 512GB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 74 197 202 232 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 379
Write 255
Mixed 273
SusWrite 174
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 18.2
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 52.1
55% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HUS72403 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: A5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 167
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 156
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST330006CLAR3000 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: YS18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 154
Write 41.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 42.8
53% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 196 198 196 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 185
Mixed 30
SusWrite 196
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 115 115 114 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
Read 99
Write 88.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 115
122% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 40
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 32.9
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback