HP EliteBook 8560p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8560p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1618
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateMay 28 '15 at 11:17
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 149
53% 115 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 224
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 1618) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 103
Write 109
Mixed 100
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 64%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
59GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 124
Write 16.9
Mixed 11.3
42% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.17
4K Write 0.21
4K Mixed 0.82
43% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 38%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.13% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 18
Mixed 9.9
22% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.73
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.25
21% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 18%
Typical EliteBook 8560p Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback