Asrock H87 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4771-$129 11,180 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 38.3 28% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 260 21% 183 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 39.8 28% 34.4 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 38 Splatting 35.1 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 320 391 383 398 341 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 336 Write 329 Mixed 324 SusWrite 358 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 16.7 56% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 292 189% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 250GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 125 123 126 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 178 Write 155 Mixed 85 SusWrite 127 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 112%
ASMT 2115 2TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 124 123 123 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 169 Write 155 Mixed 34 SusWrite 119 152% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 111%
Multi-Reader -0 2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 2GB free, PID 6368 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	6.81% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 16.7 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 16.9 20% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 9% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 18%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 750GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 68 72 73 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 144 Write 112 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 58.6 120% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 73%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 4.5 0.9 0.4 0.3 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 97.2 Write 94.2 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 5.9 77% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 51GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 68 72 73 65 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	32% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 74.5 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 66.6 89% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 356GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 4.5 0.9 0.3 0.3 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 95.5 Write 99.5 Mixed 61 SusWrite 5.9 83% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	90x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	49x
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $413

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16