Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 11:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 542
53% 436 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16.06
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 16.5
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 16.3
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 261 263 263 262 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,606
Write 796
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 296
268% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.8
251% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 492
406% 591 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 229%
Great: 271%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 105 106 106 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 75.8
Write 94.3
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 104
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 23
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback