Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 22:02
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 136
2-Core 278
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 805
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 116
Parallax 130
100% 123 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 112
Splatting 105
101% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
46GB free
Firmware: CS303121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 48 48 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 5,708
Write 50
Mixed 100
SusWrite 47.6
307% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 585
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 6.2
896% 198 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 468%
Great: 214%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 130 128 156 152 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 174
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 134
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 106%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 9.6
14% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 15%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.3 6.9 7.7 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Read 24
Write 8.3
Mixed 8
SusWrite 6.3
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 29
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $487
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback