Asrock K10N78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock K10N78  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '17 at 05:28
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 92.8
46% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 140
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3506) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.62
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.22
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget S6 06 SSD 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
Read 263
Write 193
Mixed 217
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 3.36
63% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 4.13
32% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
338GB free
Firmware: AX00
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 100
Mixed 96.3
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K10N78 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback