Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 133 59% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 410 37% 313 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 34 Parallax 41.2 27% 36 fps	MRender 46.7 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 34.6 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 31%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 97 108 108 112 100 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.6% Above average	Read 216 Write 144 Mixed 183 SusWrite 106 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 32.4 115% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 124 95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-033.A 2x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 17.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395