Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '15 at 20:48
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 122
42% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 317
35% 278 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5286
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 36.4
36% 40.1 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 33.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 95
Write 108
Mixed 59.2
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.12
71% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
184GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 27.2
Mixed 25
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
6GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 5.99
Mixed 8.39
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.21
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
18% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 7%
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback