Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 120 52% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 363 37% 297 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 20.1 Parallax 26.2 16% 22.1 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 21 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 90 82 86 96 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.1% Above average	Read 273 Write 123 Mixed 160 SusWrite 87.6 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 28.7 106% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 109 84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 357GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 111 114 111 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 154 Write 153 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 110 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-033.A 2x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.9 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395