Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '20 at 22:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 360
45% 345 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.59 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 3.73
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320413CS 319GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 53 67 58 71 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 6.8
Write 16.8
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 57
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 60%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
29GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 16.3
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 18
24% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.1
227% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-012.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 7.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback