ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq-presario VG097AA-UUW CQ5144SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	8.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario VG097AA-UUW CQ5144SC (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Eureka3
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090604
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '15 at 15:12
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 46.6 2-Core 88.6 31% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 148 22% 159 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5286 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Lighting 10.3 Reflection 9.31 Parallax 11.3 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 9.17 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -50989850823988 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 168 (B5) Unknown 0 0 3 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 168 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 265246 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 265246 (F2) Unknown 100 100 279149 (F9) Unknown 100 100 14762	20.3% Poor	Read 100 Write 67.9 Mixed 90.3 19% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 5.43 38% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 39.2 DQ Mixed 4.93 10% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 80%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 21GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 160 4908 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2442 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 33348 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1838 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 243 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2442 (C2) HDA temperature 108 95 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.5% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 56.9 Mixed 37.8 38% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.08 21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback