MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 71.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 312
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,182
107% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 44.7
39% 49.2 fps
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.2
50% 54.9 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1634 1599 1612 1658 1554 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,659
Write 2,539
Mixed 1,941
SusWrite 1,647
493% 2,197 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 94.6
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 1,194
892% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 359%
Great: 410%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
537GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1246 1255 1244 1255 601 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,398
Write 1,341
Mixed 1,028
SusWrite 955
265% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 79.3
276% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 268
325% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 231%
Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$79
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 174 178 178 166 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 100
Write 145
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 171
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 155 157 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 138
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 155
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 27.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback