MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 04:50
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 587
54% 452 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2120 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 105
Parallax 94.5
84% 101 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 97.7
79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 284 296 288 296 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 437
Write 430
Mixed 322
SusWrite 304
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 35.8
114% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 294
220% 293 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 97 94 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46% Average
Read 70.3
Write 70.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 90
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 130 131 130 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 125
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 128
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
308GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 21 20 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Read 17
Write 15.3
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 16.7
20% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 23.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback