ECS A85F2-A Deluxe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS A85F2-A Deluxe  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 127
58% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 212
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Elitegroup(1019 7C6F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 7.03
6% 7.24 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 7.26
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 303 300 305 305 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 337
Write 301
Mixed 276
SusWrite 300
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 38.9
124% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 51.5
43% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 9905403-558.A00LF 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback