Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 03:31
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 94.8
51% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 186
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 44.6
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 36.3
26% 30.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
209GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 314
Write 273
Mixed 212
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 12.7
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 12.8
19% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 95%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 298
Write 116
Mixed 147
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 13.1
89% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 10.5
25% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
346GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback