Ncstech FOUR4-MT-A402

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNcstech FOUR4-MT-A402  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-M LE/CSM
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 23:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 472
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.48
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 96.9
53% 77.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 56.9
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
15GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 210 207 200 215 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 232
Write 206
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 207
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 12.1
46% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 18.2
15% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 72.4
Mixed 32.8
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FOUR4-MT-A402 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Ncstech FOUR4-MT-A402

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback