Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 23:56
Run Duration389 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 488
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.9.2
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 24
Parallax 21.1
17% 22 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 32
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEDME400G4 400GB
37GB free
Firmware: 8DV10131
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 3,505
Write 68.8
Mixed 136
258% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 604
4K Write 4.23
4K Mixed 4.24
922% 204 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 388%
Great: 187%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 120GB-$100
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 3,482
Write 56.5
Mixed 113
253% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 548
4K Write 3.44
4K Mixed 3.39
837% 185 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 364%
Great: 69%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
851GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 32GB
4GB free, PID 4063
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 19.3
Mixed 19
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.63
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.96
82% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ- Samsung M391B5773DH0- 18KSF51272AZ- Samsung M391B5773DH0- Samsung M391B5773DH0- Samsung M391B5773DH0- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback