Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52-$231 193 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 47.3 32% 45.1 Pts	4-Core 47.3 8-Core 47.2 6% 47.2 Pts	64-Core 47.7 3% 47.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 29 28 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 22.1 Write 27.3 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 28.1 17% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 22%
Sony Storage Media 1GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.3 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.7 7% 6.53 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 6%
ASMT 2105 4TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 834GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 25 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 28 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 25.4 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16