Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 04:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 365
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 117
Parallax 99.6
88% 108 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 99
Splatting 102
81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/350G 350GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 310 42 42 74 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50% Average
Read 379
Write 318
Mixed 280
SusWrite 102
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 12
90% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 1
19% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 79%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
310GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 29 30 31 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 30.2
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 30
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback