RM DESKTOP 320

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	RM DESKTOP 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130226
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '20 at 03:58
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 342 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 56 Reflection 51.9 Parallax 46.5 46% 51.5 fps	MRender 45.7 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 48.4 39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ST250DM000-1BD141 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0924A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 370 405 411 414 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 481 Write 399 Mixed 380 SusWrite 329 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 23.2 102% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 39.5 81% 157 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 81%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 9.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 10.3 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB 6,401 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 320 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: RM DESKTOP 320

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	26x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	17x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x8GBNanyaBench 46%, 332 samples	4x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 0443 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 18GBHynixBench 47%, 4 samples	4x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16