Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 904
84% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,341
83% 1,341 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 37.9
32% 36.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 290 308 308 307 305 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 454
SusWrite 314
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 52.9
176% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
579GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 106 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 104
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
602GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 110 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 106
Write 98
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 108
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
370GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 75 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 80.8
Write 80.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 73.2
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback