HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 726
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 36.8
33% 39.2 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 39.1
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 291 287 288 290 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,983
Write 172
Mixed 530
SusWrite 290
160% 744 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 6.3
80% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 119%
Great: 295%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
303GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 694 705 717 697 741 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,421
Write 629
Mixed 837
SusWrite 695
199% 896 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 45.2
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 313
236% 319 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 160%
Great: 241%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
462GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 13 15 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 182
Write 15.9
Mixed 27
SusWrite 13.4
43% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
458GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 180
Write 14.7
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 13.4
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Kingston 9965589-037.D00G Kingston 9965589-037.D00G Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 42.4
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback