MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 17:34
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 388
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 77.2
50% 68 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 53.5
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW12 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 177 168 158 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 373
Write 200
Mixed 240
SusWrite 163
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 41.1
153% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 124
117% 182 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Samsung 860 500GB
132GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 315 315 315 316 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 468
Mixed 444
SusWrite 336
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.9
190% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817) - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback