Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 06:58
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 442
61% 451 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 54.4
38% 50.8 fps
MRender 52.8
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 43.3
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AQ04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 97 103 100 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 111
Write 97.1
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 94.9
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D535833324758344D32413234303043313620 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 28.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback