HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory68GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 68GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory39 GB free of 68.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5679
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 60.6
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 567
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 24GB
HP(103C 1157) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 86.5
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 67.5
70% 79.9 fps
MRender 82.9
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 80.6
69% 84.6 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 195 195 196 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.1% Above average
Read 240
Write 210
Mixed 206
SusWrite 195
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 29.9
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 182
136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
25GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
2GB free
Firmware: 3B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 90.2
Write 66.3
Mixed 91
18% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 8.1
39% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 24.3
27% 46 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
11GB free
Firmware: SD35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 66 69 65 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 69
Write 67.8
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 68.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PDZ1G4D1 ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 I... 102GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback