Skidata Control Unit DAU G4

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Skidata Control Unit DAU G4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Pyramid CPYSKI0001
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	46% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 120 52% 86 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 172 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.56 0% 0.66 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1 1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 148 162 159 165 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 204 Write 152 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 150 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 8.8 33% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 12.3 12% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 47%
Hitachi HTE725032A9A364 320GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 191GB free Firmware: PC3OC70E SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 53 52 49 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 33.2 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 50 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 58%
WD My Passport 259D 1.5TB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 554GB free, PID 259d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.8 4.9 6.4 4.6 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.1 6% 4.65 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 44%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB 1,445 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 22GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 7.9 Mixed 2.2 4% 5.05 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Skidata Control Unit DAU G4

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)