Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 582
61% 487 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 61.2
57% 66.8 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 69.1
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 1TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 358 356 358 360 357 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 440
Write 369
Mixed 329
SusWrite 359
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 17.5
107% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 27.2
75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 148 148 151 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 149
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 130 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 115
Write 120
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 128
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%
Liteon UITRA1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 199 199 197 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 164
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 198
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 138 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 138
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 125 127 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 115
Write 145
Mixed 108
SusWrite 124
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
431% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback