Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 08:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 737
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 2,287
142% 2,287 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 25.8
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 449 440 411 413 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 449
Mixed 399
SusWrite 420
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 42.7
143% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 50.2
42% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 455 455 457 457 457 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD 127GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback