Asrock QC5000M-ITX/PH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000M-ITX/PH  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '17 at 09:40
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 44.9
24% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 92.6
12% 88.7 Pts
64-Core 92.5
6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 448
Write 183
Mixed 205
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 7.53
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 54.7
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 15
18% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 82%
Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 2GB
0GB free, PID 6211
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5.06
Mixed 6.33
10% 9.86 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
21% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5595-001.A00LF 9905595-007.A00LF 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.2
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QC5000M-ITX/PH Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M-ITX/PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback