Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 20:35
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 86.7
47% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 221
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 36.9
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 38.9
27% 31.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 150 127 136 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 272
Write 99.3
Mixed 196
SusWrite 135
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 26.9
88% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 18.1
25% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback