Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 445 59% 440 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.97 3% 4.02 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 5 Splatting 7 5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GB 8,268 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV75M0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 292 276 254 297 297 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 959 Write 301 Mixed 316 SusWrite 286 102% 465 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 37.6 168% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 878 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 423 357% 537 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 138%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB 2,213 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 142 143 142 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 135 Write 112 Mixed 49 SusWrite 141 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2800C14D4/4GX Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 KHX2800C14D4/4GX Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 KHX2800C14D4/4GX Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 KHX2800C14D4/4GX Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	106% Outstanding	MC Read 45.5 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 36.3 117% 40.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 23.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	764x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	195x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16