TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gateway SX2865

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGateway SX2865  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway SX2865
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 04:37
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 182
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 294
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 70.4%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Dell(1028 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.21%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$142
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 162 200 201 182 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 239
Write 222
Mixed 201
SusWrite 187
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 30.1
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 127
109% 160 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 60.7%
 Great: 89%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
250GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 22.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 25.2
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 16.6%
 Great: 65%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
5GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4 3.9 3.6 4.3 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 3.9
5% 5.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.89%
 Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical SX2865 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway SX2865

CPU
Pentium G2020Intel  $92Bench 49%, 15,664 samples6x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples6x
Pentium G630Intel  $37Bench 47%, 12,397 samples5x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples4x
SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples4x
Blue SA510 2.5 1000GBWDBench 90%, 3,795 samples4x
CS1311 240GBPNY  $78Bench 81%, 26,547 samples3x
RAM
ACR512X64D3U16C11G Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 12 samples5x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples3x
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 480 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback