Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 09:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 129
58% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) 2GB
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 43.7
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 39.1
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 214 217 216 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 205
Mixed 199
SusWrite 214
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 19.8
99% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 32.4
57% 113 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 170 172 171 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 120
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 170
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 99U5584-009.A 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback