Asus Z97I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97I-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 21:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 701
77% 608 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 37.8
26% 33.6 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 33.9
31% 38 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 265 276 276 266 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 451
Mixed 363
SusWrite 277
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 54.7
201% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 364
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
RHDM2DDHP8A2-N3C8 127GB
118GB free
Firmware: N0815A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 307 312 313 315 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 313
Mixed 295
SusWrite 300
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 41.5
159% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 196
174% 261 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
281GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45% Average
Read 89
Write 91.7
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 67.5
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
4TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 161 161 161 156 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 157
191% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 26.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 47.6
84% 47.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97I-PLUS Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z97I-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback