HP 500-120ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 500-120ea  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 09:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 93
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 342
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 5.72
3% 5.12 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7
5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,730
Write 35.5
Mixed 70
266% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 505
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3
770% 170 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
838GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,922
Write 34
Mixed 66.5
960% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 540
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.7
22,811% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
144GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,733
Write 27
Mixed 54.2
910% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 562
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.6
23,597% 188 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-120ea Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-120ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback